Thursday, July 29, 2010

7/29 Outreach News

1. Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Jane Harman (D-Venice), chair of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing and Terrorism Risk Assessment and a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, today introduced the bipartisan Next Generation Public Safety Device Act of 2010 with Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL).

The legislation will spur innovation and competition in the development of next generation mobile communications devices that will provide the highest-speed transmission of data, voice, and video services over the Internet for police, firefighters and EMTs at an affordable price. It authorizes a $70 million grant competition to develop and build prototype mission critical voice and data-capable handsets and vehicle-portable devices for the 700 MHz spectrum.

The public safety market, due to its relatively small size and niche requirements, is currently a monopoly. As a result, first responders and local governments can pay up to $5,000 per radio. Despite the cost, these devices do not enable seamless on-the-ground coordination between first responders or allow them to access databanks, fingerprint records, facial recognition software, or streaming video.

“Almost a decade after 9/11, America’s first responders still do not have the communication tools they need to support their mission,” said Harman. “Directed research and development is essential to achieving interoperability because it will drive down cost and develop devices that public safety has a hand in selecting. Equally as important, this bill will accelerate the development of those devices, quickly giving public safety more options with new cost savings to states and localities, and assurance that the technology can be trusted for their important work.”

“As a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee and an E-911 Caucus co-chair, I have heard from first responders about the lack of equipment to meet their needs in emergency situations,” said Shimkus. “We have made great strides in some areas, such as call centers, but interoperable frontline equipment is still not affordable for most departments. I support this bipartisan legislation that will provide safety to both our first responders and the American people.”

The Next Generation Public Safety Device Act is endorsed by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials,which has identified research and development as one of its top priorities, the Fraternal Order of Police, the National Emergency Numbers Association and telecommunication carriers including Sprint and the Rural Cellular Association.

Additional information can be found at: http://harman.house.gov/2010/07/harman-bill-spurs-innovation-competition-for-next-generation-mobile-communications-for-first-respond.shtml

2. The Senate language for the Lieberman-McCain bill (Senate Bill 3625) that reallocates the D Block to public safety and provides funding for broadband deployment can be found here.

3. PUBLIC SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY BUREAU ANNOUNCES REGION 9 (FLORIDA) PUBLIC SAFETY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEES TO HOLD 700 MHZ AND 800 MHZ NPSPAC MEETINGS. (DA No. 10-1410). (Dkt No 90-119 ). PSHSB
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1410A1.pdf

4. The State of Ohio, the Ohio SIEC, and Region 33 filed important Ex Parte notices with the Commission today (please see attached).

5. On Tuesday of this week, DHS Assistant Secretary Greg Schaffer testified before the House Subcommittee on Emergency Communications, Preparedness and Response.
Attached is a copy of Assistant Secretary Schaffer's testimony.
In addition, his testimony, along with a video of the hearing, committee statements, and other witness testimony, is available at http://homeland.house.gov/hearings/index.asp?ID=266. .

For those attending the APCO Conference in Houston next week, we look forward to seeing you there. Please visit OEC booth # 1219 and let us know how you are doing.

OEC speaking engagements during APCO Conference:
Chris Essid at the First General Business Session, August 1, at 1:05 p.m.
Dusty Rhoads at a panel on Lessons Learned in Moving from Coded Substitutions to Plain Language, August 2, at 4:30 p.m.
Jimmy Downes at a panel on Project 25: A Users’ Perspective, August 3, at 1:30 p.m.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

President Proposes Delay in D Block Auction

1. The article below is provided courtesy of Paul Kirby and TR Daily

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SAYS FCC SHOULD HOLD OFF ON D-BLOCK AUCTION

The Obama administration said today that the FCC should hold off reauctioning the 700 megahertz band D block to provide more time to analyze the FCC's public safety broadband network proposal and related issues, including technical and legal matters concerning priority roaming by public safety entities onto commercial networks. The administration said it is establishing an interagency task force to study the issues.

Meanwhile, the chairwoman and ranking member of a House Homeland Security subcommittee expressed skepticism with the FCC's plan at a hearing today. Witnesses for and against reauctioning the D block reiterated points they have made elsewhere.

The developments are the latest setback for the FCC's national broadband plan (NBP) recommendation to reauction the D block and encourage public safety agencies to leverage commercial deployment of fourth-generation LTE (long term evolution) technology. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has held off circulating an item on D-block reauction rules for political reasons, according to some sources.

Bills are pending in the House and Senate that would direct the FCC to reallocate the D block to public safety rather than reauction it, and Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee Chairman John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV (D., W.Va.) has announced his intention to introduce legislation as well (TRDaily, July 21).

The Obama administration has endorsed the NBP's call to identify an additional 500 MHz of spectrum for commercial broadband uses over the next decade, and it says that "the first claim" on revenues from the auction of any reallocated spectrum should go to public safety for a broadband network (TRDaily, June 28). However, the administration has not said what spectrum - including the D block - should be auctioned.

"At this point, we are saying that we believe that a decision on an auction needs to await some of these technical answers," Gregory Schaffer, assistant secretary-cybersecurity and communications at the Department of Homeland Security, said in response to questions from Rep. Laura Richardson (D., Calif.), chairwoman of the House emergency communications, preparedness, and response subcommittee.

Mr. Schaffer said in his prepared testimony that the Obama administration "is establishing a joint task force on public safety interoperability to better understand and identify public safety requirements, test assumptions and approaches associated with meeting those requirements, recommend technical, policy, process, and governance solutions, and coordinate with the FCC. This task force will allow personnel from several of the departments and agencies with major interoperability competencies to work in partnership with the public safety community." He said DHS is working with the Department of Justice, with support from the Commission.

"The Administration also plans to convene a forum this fall to discuss funding, spectrum requirements, technology issues, and governance models necessary to support the development of a next generation network for public safety communications," Mr. Schaffer noted.

Mr. Schaffer said that the task force would, in particular, analyze technical and legal issues surrounding the FCC's proposal that public safety agencies be allowed priority roaming onto commercial networks when the 10 MHz of spectrum they currently have isn't enough. "Both the technical and legal frameworks for this type of plan must be evaluated, and capacity and capability outcomes understood, before any decision can be made regarding the spectrum requirements for public safety," he said. He stressed the need to test the LTE technical standard on a government demonstration network in Boulder, Colo.

Mr. Schaffer also stressed that sufficient funding will be needed in order for the FCC's plan to become reality. And he said work needs to be done before commercial LTE networks will be able to handle mission-critical voice communications.

Ms. Richardson and Rep. Michael D. Rogers (R., Ala.), the subcommittee's ranking member, questioned whether the new task force announced by Mr. Schaffer would duplicate functions already performed by the Emergency Communications Preparedness Center (ECPC), which was launched last year and includes 14 federal agencies.

Mr. Schaffer replied that the ECPC has a "very broad mandate" that focuses on the emergency communications needs of federal agencies, whereas the new task force would focus on the needs of state and local agencies - and especially the FCC's proposals. "The FCC has spent a year preparing their plan and focusing on it," he said. "The administration is trying to put some focus on it as well."

He also said that the Emergency Response Interoperability Center (ERIC) at the FCC and DHS's Office of Emergency Communications (OEC) could complement each other, but Rep. Rogers suggested the missions of the two entities were "in conflict."

Mr. Schaffer said the task force would also work to ensure that public safety's voice is heard - something Rep. Richardson - and the full committee's chairman, Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D., Miss.) - suggested wasn't done when the FCC prepared the NBP. Most major public safety groups want the D block reallocated and have been critical of the FCC's reauction proposal.

"Clearly, there has been a disconnect with public safety in some respects and it must be resolved," Rep. Richardson said. "I believe DHS with its close interactions with the public safety community could definitely help bridge the gap."

"This Committee needs to hear the extent to which DHS, during the developmental stages, conducted outreach to the public safety community and, in turn, represented the community's interests in the process," Rep. Thompson said in a written statement. "The fact that some in the public safety community are advocating for reallocation of the D Block gives the impression that their interests were not adequately represented in the process." The lawmaker also said that "it may be very difficult to find the funding" to construct a nationwide public safety broadband network but also that "[r]esources should not be a barrier to participation in a nationwide system."

Rep. Rogers noted that he was an original cosponsor of HR 5081, which Rep. Peter T. King (R., N.Y), ranking member of the full committee, introduced in April to force the FCC to reallocate the D block.

Ms. Richardson asked Jamie Barnett, chief of the FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, what input the agency had sought from public safety as it prepared the public safety portion of the NBP. Mr. Barnett said FCC officials had "hundreds" of meetings, calls, workshops, and forums with public safety representatives, adding, "I have never refused a meeting with anyone who requested it, and often I would call to request it." He said he "would have loved to have agreed" with the public safety community on the D block but that the evidence didn't support it.

Ms. Richardson asked whether Mr. Barnett would be willing to discuss a possible compromise with public safety. "I'm always open to working with and talking to public safety," he replied. In response to another question from Ms. Richardson, who questioned how much input DHS had into the NBP, Mr. Barnett said the FCC kept DHS and OEC officials informed "from the very beginning" as it formulated the public safety proposals for the NBP, adding the agencies have "a pretty good level of interaction."

Mr. Schaffer also told Ms. Richardson in response to a question that DHS was willing to work with the FCC and DHS to find a solution to the current impasse.

Ms. Richardson repeatedly criticized the FCC's priority roaming proposal, echoing the complaints of many public safety officials that it wouldn't guarantee first responders would be able to access clogged networks. "In my opinion, priority access means nothing in terms of emergencies," she said. "Priority access is not adequate."

Witness Charles Dowd, deputy chief of the New York Police Department, agreed, saying that public safety agencies have always found they can't depend on often-congested commercial networks during emergencies. "We must be able to manage and control the network so our data has absolute priority," he said. Mr. Dowd also said he found Mr. Schaffer's discussion of the federal interagency task force "a little bit troubling" because he didn't mention any participation by local public safety entities.

Jeff Johnson, president and chairman of the International Association of Fire Chiefs, was asked how much the FCC reached out to public safety in formulating its plan. "I think it's fair to say that they have been talking to us," he replied, but added that "we do not feel that they feel our urgency" on the need to reallocate the D block. Messrs. Dowd and Johnson also complained that an FCC white paper on expected public safety broadband capacity needs was issued after the release of the NBP rather than before it.

Eric Graham, vice president-strategic and government relations for Cellular South, Inc., who testified on behalf of the Rural Cellular Association, which favors a D-block reauction, suggested that LTE technology would facilitate the type of priority access public safety agencies need. The technology "will allow carriers to manage users on an individual basis," he said, permitting them to drop non-public safety callers if necessary. However, the NBP does not suggest such a preemptive regime.

Richard Mirgon, president of the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International, told TRDaily after the hearing that he hadn't heard of the task force Mr. Schaffer mentioned. He said it seems clear that DHS believes more analysis of the NBP is needed. "However, I'm not sure there's not some underlying politics on the issue," he added.

Mr. Mirgon also agreed with suggestions by lawmakers that the task force would duplicate other efforts. "I mean, how many groups can we put together to talk about this issue?" he asked. - Paul Kirby, paul.kirby@wolterskluwer.com

2. There was a Hearing conducted this morning by the Subcommittee on Emergency Communications, Preparedness, and Response of the House Homeland Security Committee. Chief Charles Dowd (NYPD), Chief Johnson (IAFC President), and Robert LeGrande testified as did Jamie Barnett of the FCC and Greg Shaffer of DHS. You can view the archived video of the Hearing or download the written testimony which is accessible at http://homeland.house.gov/Hearings/index.asp?ID=266

Friday, July 23, 2010

Public Safety Communications Outreach

A number of new items to share relative to public safety communications issues.

1. Senators Lieberman and McCain introduced legislation in the United States Senate to reallocate the D Block to public safety. The draft of their proposed legislation is attached.
2. APCO and other public safety organizations continue to make the case for the D Block transfer (see attached).
3. Several governors have signaled their support for the D Block transfer (see attached))
4. There are now 57 co-sponsors of H.R. 5081 (please see list below)

Bill Summary & Status 111th Congress (2009 - 2010) H.R.5081Cosponsors
H.R.5081

Title: Broadband for First Responders Act of 2010

Sponsor: Rep King, Peter T. [NY-3] (introduced 4/20/2010) Cosponsors (57) Latest Major

Action: 4/20/2010 Referred to House committee.

Status: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

COSPONSORS(57), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]:
Rep Arcuri, Michael A. [NY-24] - 7/20/2010
Rep Baca, Joe [CA-43] - 7/21/2010
Rep Bachus, Spencer [AL-6] - 7/14/2010
Rep Barrett, J. Gresham [SC-3] - 6/29/2010
Rep Berkley, Shelley [NV-1] - 5/18/2010
Rep Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. [GA-2] - 7/15/2010
Rep Bonner, Jo [AL-1] - 5/20/2010
Rep Boswell, Leonard L. [IA-3] - 4/22/2010
Rep Braley, Bruce L. [IA-1] - 6/28/2010
Rep Burton, Dan [IN-5] - 7/14/2010
Rep Cao, Anh "Joseph" [LA-2] - 4/20/2010
Rep Carson, Andre [IN-7] - 6/28/2010
Rep Carter, John R. [TX-31] - 5/20/2010
Rep Chu, Judy [CA-32] - 7/20/2010
Rep Clarke, Yvette D. [NY-11] - 4/20/2010
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 5/27/2010
Rep Connolly, Gerald E. "Gerry" [VA-11] - 5/25/2010
Rep Forbes, J. Randy [VA-4] - 6/22/2010
Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 6/29/2010
Rep Garamendi, John [CA-10] - 7/15/2010
Rep Gerlach, Jim [PA-6] - 5/5/2010
Rep Halvorson, Deborah L. [IL-11] - 7/14/2010
Rep Hastings, Alcee L. [FL-23] - 7/13/2010
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 5/27/2010
Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. [IL-2] - 7/13/2010
Rep Johnson, Eddie Bernice [TX-30] - 5/28/2010
Rep Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. [GA-4] - 6/30/2010
Rep Kaptur, Marcy [OH-9] - 7/13/2010
Rep Kratovil, Frank, Jr. [MD-1] - 4/22/2010
Rep Latham, Tom [IA-4] - 5/20/2010
Rep Lee, Christopher J. [NY-26] - 5/25/2010
Rep Linder, John [GA-7] - 6/14/2010
Rep Lipinski, Daniel [IL-3] - 6/22/2010
Rep Loebsack, David [IA-2] - 7/13/2010
Rep Lowey, Nita M. [NY-18] - 5/25/2010
Rep Maloney, Carolyn B. [NY-14] - 6/15/2010
Rep McCollum, Betty [MN-4] - 6/22/2010
Rep McMahon, Michael E. [NY-13] - 4/26/2010
Rep Meek, Kendrick B. [FL-17] - 6/10/2010
Rep Meeks, Gregory W. [NY-6] - 6/25/2010
Rep Miller, Candice S. [MI-10] - 4/20/2010
Rep Nadler, Jerrold [NY-8] - 6/22/2010
Rep Neugebauer, Randy [TX-19] - 7/21/2010
Rep Oberstar, James L. [MN-8] - 5/20/2010
Rep Olson, Pete [TX-22] - 6/23/2010
Rep Owens, William L. [NY-23] - 7/13/2010
Rep Paulsen, Erik [MN-3] - 7/19/2010
Rep Pingree, Chellie [ME-1] - 7/19/2010
Rep Reichert, David G. [WA-8] - 6/30/2010
Rep Rogers, Mike D. [AL-3] - 4/20/2010
Rep Scott, Robert C. "Bobby" [VA-3] - 7/21/2010
Rep Shuler, Heath [NC-11] - 5/25/2010
Rep Tanner, John S. [TN-8] - 7/22/2010
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. [NY-9] - 6/14/2010
Rep Wittman, Robert J. [VA-1] - 5/20/2010
Rep Wolf, Frank R. [VA-10] - 7/19/2010
Rep Young, Don [AK] - 7/20/2010


A number of press articles have been released with information. Relevant links are provided below.

http://www.rrmediagroup.com/newsArticle.cfm?news_id=5914

http://tvtechnology.com/article/103780

http://www.convergedigest.com/regulatory/regulatoryarticle.asp?ID=30969

http://urgentcomm.com/policy_and_law/news/lieberman-mccain-dblock-support-20100722/

http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/story/new-senate-bill-gives-d-block-public-safety-network/2010-07-22

http://www.sheriffs.org/assets/temp/3A87C619044F40EEBE9113EC57BEA325.htm

http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Press.MajorityNews&ContentRecord_id=f6e32e49-5056-8059-7650-6ab43ded4d58

Key Governors Support Reallocation of D-Block to Public Safety

On Wednesday, July 21, 2010 Governors Patterson of NY, Gibbons of NV, Kulongoski of OR, Culver of IA, Quinn, of IL and O'Malley of MD wrote the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation expressing support for the reallocation of the D-Block Spectrum for public safety. Read the entire letter here.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

McCain-Lieberman Bill

Below is a link to the McCain-Lieberman Senate press release announcing legislation to give public safety to the D Block and $11B in funding. Attached is the draft legislation. At first blush, it looks pretty good and gives $5.5B for construction (80-20 match) and $5.5B for operations and maintenance. The money comes from an auction of the 1.7 and 2.1 GHz band. It also looks like the 700 MHz voice channels are protected. There is one interesting caveat in the bill; the FCC is directed to perform a study to look at the issues of completely moving public safety into the 700 and 800 MHz band in the future.

http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=f6f4bfa4-ece0-1ceb-98e1-ebbdcd599205

I’ll update everyone as I learn more about this bill and how it may contrast with other legislation in the hopper.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

FCC Notices - Outreach

1. The Commission has clarified its rules relative to the participation to permit amateur radio operators to transmit messages, under certain limited circumstances, during either government-sponsored or non-government sponsored emergency and disaster preparedness drills, regardless of whether the operators are employees of entities participating in the drill. Although public safety land mobile radio systems are the primary means of radio-based communications for emergency responders, experience has shown that amateur radio has played an important role in preparation for, during, and in the aftermath of, natural and man-made emergencies and disasters.

AMENDMENT OF PART 97 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE COMMUNICATIONS DURING GOVERNMENT DISASTER DRILLS. Amended the rules in this proceeding. Dismissed the American Hospital Association request for blanket waiver. Dismissed the Amateur Radio Policy Committee Petition for Rulemaking. (Dkt No. 10-72 10-54 ). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 07/14/2010 by R&O. (FCC No. 10-124). PSHSB
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-124A1.doc
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-124A1.pdf
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-124A1.txt

2. FCC "MOST IMPROVED" FEDERAL AGENCY IN GOVERNMENT SURVEY. STMT. News Media Contact: Jen Howard at (202) 418-0506, email: Jen.Howard@fcc.gov OCH http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299718A1.doc
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299718A1.pdf
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299718A1.txt

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Auction of D Block

Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Henry Waxman (D-CA) very recently released a statement in Roll Call magazine advocating the auction of the D Block as opposed to reallocating it to public safety. The Roll Call article does not expressly state if the “bipartisan staff draft of the Public Safety Broadband Act” continues to permit the use of 700 MHz voice frequencies for broadband (see attached) or if these resources will also be included in the auction process.

In this week’s edition of Mission Critical, competing statements regarding the D Block are offered by Admiral Barnett (advocating the auction) and Douglas Jarrett (opposing the auction). Links to these statements can be found at:

Admiral Barnett http://mccmag.com/onlyonline.cfm?OnlyOnlineID=186

Mr. Jarrett http://www.radioresourcemag.com/onlyonline.cfm?OnlyOnlineID=185

Also attached is the FCC’s original Capacity Study to which Admiral Barnett refers in his comments. Opposing viewpoints from the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council, Motorola, Andrew Seybold, and the Public Safety Alliance (“PSA”) are also offered. The PSA represents:

1. The International Association of Chiefs of Police
2. International Association of Fire Chiefs
3. National Sheriff’s Association
4. Major Cities Chief’s Association
5. Major Counties Sheriff’s Association
6. Metropolitan Fire Chiefs Association
7. APCO
8. National Emergency Management Association

Thursday, July 8, 2010

700 MHz Broadband Information

1. As a reminder, the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Extended the Comment Date for the Public Notice Addressing Interoperability, Out-of-Band Emissions and Equipment Certification for 700 MHz Public Safety Broadband Networks. The PN extends the date in which comments are due to July 19, 2010. Public Notice: Word Acrobat

2. A number of press articles have been released today related to a paper of the Public Safety Alliance entitled House of Cards FCC’s Capacity White Paper Built on Assumptions and Conjecture. The Alliance Paper is attached for your review along with the original FCC Capacity White Paper and the other papers offered in response to the Commission’s White Paper. It is important for readers to have the position paper of the Commission along with other documents so that one may draw their own conclusions relative to the “D” Block issues.

A. http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/story/d-block-questions-fcc-and-public-safety/2010-07-08-0
B. http://www.psafirst.org/uploads/documents/PSA_House_of_Cards_Report_070210-1.pdf
C. http://www.lawofficer.com/article/public-safety-communications/public-safety-reacts-fcc-findi

Additional Files
http://www.rcc.com/blog/rcc-regulatoryactions/MotExparteFCCcapacitypaperFinal7210.pdf
http://www.rcc.com/blog/rcc-regulatoryactions/DSRCpaper6-2010.pdf

Outreach Information

1. ERRATUM - AMENDMENT OF PART 101 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO ACCOMMODATE 30 MEGAHERTZ CHANNELS IN THE 6525-6875 MHZ BAND, ET AL. Issued an Erratum correcting Report and Order, FCC 10-109, released June 11, 2010. (Dkt No. RM-11417 09-114 ). Action by: Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau by ERRATUM. WTB
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299636A1.doc
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299636A1.pdf
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299636A1.txt

2. Don’t Miss the Second Canada-U.S. Cross Border Interoperable Communications Workshop!
The 2010 Canada-U.S. Cross Border Interoperable Communications Workshop occurs in Windsor, Ontario from September 13 to 15, 2010. Co-hosted by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Emergency Communications (OEC) and Public Safety Canada (PS), the workshop will bring together a broad base of users and officials from all levels of government from both nations with an interest in cross border communications along the Canada-U.S. border. Don’t miss your opportunity to provide direct input to senior Canadian and U.S. government officials regarding future action plans that address cross border interoperability challenges. The target audience for this event includes interoperability leaders and users from:

• Emergency Response Agencies (law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services, emergency managers)
• Other Public Safety Providers (federal, state/provincial, and local/municipal)
• Military and Coast Guard
• Government Agencies and Utilities
Visit http://www.cacp.ca/index/eventscontent?contentId=940 for complete information.

3. For those interested in new technology, I came across an interesting paper yesterday regarding the dedicated short range communications.

4. Transportation Hazards & Security Summit and Workshop 2010: Focus on Implementation
Joint Summer Meeting of:
AASHTO Special Committee on Transportation Security and Emergency Management (SCOTSEM)
AASHTO Special Committee on Wireless Communications Technology (SCOWCoT)
TRB NCHRP Project Panel 20-59, Surface Transportation Security Research (NCHRP 20-59) with USDOT Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), TSA Highway and Motor Carrier Division (TSA HMC) DHS Science & Technology Directorate, Infrastructure and Geophysical Division (S&T IGD)
Irvine, California
August 23-26, 2010

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Outreach Information

1. Please find attached Volume 002 of the ECF.

What is the ECF?
Formerly the Emergency Communications Quarterly, the ECF is the latest evolution of OEC’s stakeholder outreach efforts. The ECF engages and informs emergency responders; policy makers; and Federal, State, local, and tribal officials about issues and events that directly affect everyday nationwide emergency communications. The launch of the ECF has been guided by stakeholder feedback and is an effort to provide timely and relevant content. As we prepare for future editions please let us know what you think along the way at OEC@hq.dhs.gov.

Contribute a Story
The ECF covers stories contributed by members of the emergency response community nationwide. If you are interested in submitting an article to the ECF regarding emergency communications in the field, best practices, and lessons learned, or if you have any feedback or suggestions please e-mail us at OEC@hq.dhs.gov.

2. Andrew Seybold has released a paper on Incident Communications.
A link to the paper is: http://andrewseybold.com/1763-incident-communications

3. Registration Now Open for the Canada-U.S. Cross Border Interoperable Communications Workshop

The 2010 Canada - U.S. Cross Border Interoperable Communications Workshop occurs in Windsor, Ontario from September 13 to 15 2010. Co-hosted by Public Safety Canada (PS) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Office of Emergency Communications (OEC), the workshop will bring together a broad base of users and officials from all levels of government from both nations with an interest in cross border communications along the Canada-U.S. border. The target audience for this event includes interoperability leaders and users from:

• Emergency Response Agencies (law enforcement, fire, emergency medical services, emergency managers)
• Other Public Safety Providers (federal, state/provincial, and local/municipal)
• Military and Coast Guard
• Government Agencies and Utilities

Visit http://www.cacp.ca/index/eventscontent?contentId=940 for complete information.

Attend the Fourth Canadian Public Safety Interoperability Workshop: A CITIG National Forum

This event will sell out like in past! Be sure to join us from December 5 to 8, 2010 in Victoria, British Columbia for the Fourth Canadian Public Safety Interoperability Workshop. The event will again bring together a broad base of public safety and emergency management practitioners to develop a mutual understanding of the key voice and data - interoperability issues facing today's public safety sector. With a focus on information exchange, topic-specific discussion and interactive break-outs, the fourth national workshop aims to support and promote the transfer of best practices and experience, and the development of a more unified approach to public safety interoperability across the country, between nations and internationally.

Visit www.citig.ca more detailed event information and visit http://www.cacp.ca/index/eventscontent?contentId=851 to register on line.

The above mentioned events and many more are listed on the new and improved Interoperability Practitioner's Portal (a.k.a., the CITIG Member Site). Those interested in accessing news and tools to improve communications interoperability are invited to visit and register at http://www.citig.ca/.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Outreach Committee Information

1. PUBLIC SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON WHETHER THE COMMISSION'S RULES CONCERNING DISRUPTIONS TO COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD APPLY TO BROADBAND INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS AND INTERCONNECTED VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL SERVICE PROVIDERS. (DA No. 10-1245). (Dkt No 09-137 05-271 09-47 04-35 09-51 ). Comments Due: 08/02/2010. Reply Comments Due: 08/16/2010. PSHSB . Contact: Jeffery Goldthorp at (202) 418-1096 http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1245A1.doc
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1245A1.pdf
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1245A1.txt

2. In response of the Commission’s Broadband Capacity Report, to which NPSTC recently filed Ex Parte Comments, Motorola has also filed an Ex Parte that merits the review of public safety communications officials. Please see below for all relevant documents.

http://www.rcc.com/blog/rcc-regulatoryactions/MotExparteFCCcapacitypaperFinal7210.pdf
http://www.rcc.com/blog/rcc-regulatoryactions/NPSTC_700BBresponse-July-2.pdf
http://www.rcc.com/blog/rcc-regulatoryactions/6-15-2010-WhitePaperDOC-298799A1.pdf

Saturday, July 3, 2010

DHS Bulletins

Please view the Department of Homeland Security bulletins reguarding awareness for 2010 Independence Day and the use of pressure cookers as improvised explosive devices.

http://www.rcc.com/blog/rcc-regulatoryactions/CIP_Notice83-10_IndependenceDayAwareness.pdf

http://www.rcc.com/blog/rcc-regulatoryactions/CIPFOUO-Notice%2085-10_PressureCookers_IED_components.pdf

2 July 2010, TRDaily

Information below is courtesy of TR Daily – Paul Kirby


NPSTC BLASTS FCC’s 700 MHz BAND PUBLIC SAFETY CAPACITY PAPER

The National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) today blasted an FCC white paper (attached) that attempts to back up the Commission’s determination that the public safety community’s broadband needs can be met without the reallocation to first responders of the 700 megahertz band D block.

“This capacity whitepaper is aimed at justifying the Commission’s recommendation not to reallocate the D block spectrum to public safety,” NPSTC, a federation of 15 public safety organizations, said in an ex parte filing in Public Safety docket 06-229 (attached).

NPSTC endorsed recent criticism of the FCC’s capacity white paper, which was released June 15, that was leveled by wireless industry analyst Andrew Seybold. Mr. Seybold disagreed with the paper’s conclusion that the 10 MHz of spectrum already licensed to the Public Safety Spectrum Trust (PSST) “provides more than the required capacity for day to day communications,” and that having the D block wouldn’t meet public safety’s needs during “the worst emergencies.”

“In addition, NPSTC believes the Commission should provide more deference to input from actual public safety users who are on the ground and have had experience with public safety incidents than calculations from academia,” the federation said. The white paper was coauthored by outgoing FCC Chief Technologist John Peha, who is on leave as a professor at Carnegie Mellon University. “The City of New York submitted a whitepaper addressing why the D block should be reallocated to public safety. This paper included information from real world experiences, not just academic theories.”

NPSTC said that the New York City white paper, which was submitted in February, noted that commercial wireless networks often fail due to congestion or the breakdown of infrastructure during major emergencies. The city also cited the difficulty first responders have had in getting priority access on commercial networks, in part because they don’t have “preemptive access” but are only placed at the “top of the queue.” “Based on this real world experience, the Commission’s plan that would force public safety to roam onto commercial networks by providing inadequate dedicated public safety spectrum is ill-advised,” NPSTC contended.

The federation also took issue with the FCC white paper’s claim that NPSTC had estimated that data rates of 256 kilobits per second would be adequate to support public safety video demands.

“The reference to 256 kb/s came from NPSTC’s report on Public Safety 700 MHz Broadband Statement of Requirements (SOR),” NPSTC said. “The NPSTC SOR was developed 3 years ago to help define the minimum requirements the Commission should impose on the D block operator. The 256 kb/s value was a minimum for uplink with a minimum for downlink being 1MB/s for a single handset device. . . . It was never NPSTC’s intent to imply that 256 kb/s would be a sufficient data rate to support the video levels of quality needed by public safety in all situations.”

NPSTC added, “It is clear that the Commission’s thinking on the need for increased consumer broadband capacity has evolved over that time period. Similarly, public safety’s capacity requirements and interest in broadband applications have also increased and is expected to do so even more, now that the Commission has made provisions for jurisdictions to deploy public safety grade systems.

“Finally, NPSTC believes that establishing capacity requirements for a nationwide broadband network that will take several years to deploy and must serve public safety for many years should
not be set based on minimum requirements,” the organization added. “Doing so provides no room to grow and undercuts public safety’s goals for broadband communications from the outset.”

Robert Kenny, a spokesman for the FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, defended the FCC’s capacity paper today. “We believe that public funding to harden the public safety network, coupled with new 4G technology, will enable public safety to benefit greatly from access beyond their dedicated network when they need it,” he said. He declined to comment on NPSTC’s contention that the FCC white paper used its 256 kbps estimate out of context.

In an interview last week, Mr. Peha told TRDaily that New York City, which has contended that public safety broadband video applications need data rates of 1.2 megabits per second, “made assumptions that were simply incompatible.” He said the city’s planned system “could not possibly support 1.2 mbps video” because it wouldn’t have enough cell sites. He also cited the NPSTC estimate. The FCC’s white paper complained that the city proposed a design that “minimizes cell site deployment at the expense of spectral efficiency of” the city’s proposed 20 MHz allocation.

Meanwhile, the National Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) asked the FCC in a letter Wednesday to promptly issue a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning a D-block reauction. The FOP first endorsed a reauction in February (TRDaily, Feb. 22). The FCC has said it would adopt an NPRM and order late in the second quarter or early in the third quarter regarding a reauction.

“The commercial entity that purchases the D Block will need to be a partner to law enforcement, and the sooner this partnership can begin, the better for all parties involved,” the group said.

“We also support enhanced roaming - a key component of the National Broadband Plan for public safety, which will allow agencies to operate across jurisdictional boundaries during an emergency,” the FOP added. “Nationwide roaming can also reduce capacity constraints on public safety broadband operations by providing additional spectrum resources for public safety operations and may lower agencies’ costs by expanding the pool of potential 700 MHz commercial partners for public safety and creating greater economies of scale for devices compatible with public safety spectrum.”

In another development, the city of Chicago has asked the FCC to employ an expedited approval process for granting additional waivers to build out public safety broadband systems that doesn’t involve putting such requests out for comment. The city made the request as it sought a waiver last week; the filing was not posted electronically until yesterday. Other recent waiver requesters include the Louisiana Statewide Interoperability Executive Committee and the Georgia Broadband Alliance. In May, the FCC approved 21 waiver requests (TRDaily, May 12).- Paul Kirby, paul.kirby@wolterskluwer.com

SUPPLEMENTAL SPENDING BILL WOULD RECLAIM $602M IN RECOVERY ACT BROADBAND FUNDING
The House yesterday approved a measure that would reclaim $602 million in broadband grant and loan funding authorized last year, as part of $11.7 billion in rescissions of previously authorized funding to offset fiscal year 2010 supplemental appropriations.

Specifically, the FY 2010 supplemental appropriations bill (HR 4899), as amended by the House yesterday on a 239-182 vote, would rescind $302 million in funding for the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program overseen by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration and $300 million in funding for the Broadband Initiatives Program overseen by the Rural Utilities Services. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act last year appropriated $4.7 billion for BTOP grants and $2.5 billion for BIP grants and loans, directing that the funds be awarded to applicants by Sept. 30 of this year.

The FY 2010 supplement appropriations bill now heads back to the Senate, which is on recess until July 12.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said today that the department and its RUS unit are “focused on reviewing the applications before us and working with funding we have” and would “continue to work toward the goal,” although he added that “we obviously will work within whatever funding authority” Congress sets.

Responding to a reporter’s question during a conference call regarding nearly $310 million in BIP funding awards announced today (see separate story) and whether he regretted not awarding the total BIP appropriation more quickly, so that it would not be available for rescission, Secretary Vilsack said, “This has been a great exercise for us” in terms of identifying the broadband needs of rural communities, and the department has learned things that can now be transferred to RUS’s ongoing telecom and broadband grant and loan programs.

“I think we have done this in a very timely way,” the secretary said, adding, “I don’t have any regrets in terms of how we’ve done this.” He said, “At the end of the day, regardless of the total dollars invested, we’re going to continue to focus on this and . . . press forward.”

A spokeswoman for NTIA said that the agency is “aware that Congress is grappling” with budget issues but that the agency is focusing on administering BTOP and investing the broadband stimulus funding appropriated by the Recovery Act.

After the broadband stimulus project awards announced today, NTIA has roughly $3 billion left to award from last year’s Recovery Act BTOP appropriation and RUS has about $1.5 billion left to award from the BIP appropriation. Because the BIP funding can be used for both grants and loans - while BTOP awards are all grants - and only the cost of making a loan, rather than the entire
principal amount of the loan, has to be counted as spending, that $1.5 billion is expected to be leveraged to offer a total of $2 billion in loans and grants, Secretary Vilsack said.
Also among the changes approved by the House yesterday is an additional Department of Homeland Security appropriation of $14 million “to remain available until September 30, 2011, for costs of designing, building, and deploying tactical communications for support of enforcement activities on the Southwest Border of the United States.”

The supplemental appropriations bill would also provide $13 million “for the ongoing acquisition and installation of a modern digital radio system because of known security threats.” This provision was included in earlier versions of the bill.

The White House yesterday evening threatened to veto the supplemental spending bill when it comes to the president’s desk if it still contains $800 million in rescissions from education reform programs currently in the bill. The policy statement contained no mention of the rescissions in the broadband stimulus programs.

The Media Access Project today issued a statement opposing the redirection of “nearly a tenth of the total of $7.2 billion” in broadband stimulus funding to “offset the deficit in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.” MAP Senior Vice President and Director-policy Andrew Jay Schwartzman said, “War spending must not take precedence over connecting underserved households, schools, health care facilities, and libraries to high-speed Internet service in a time of continued economic difficulty and social inequality.” - Lynn Stanton, lynn.stanton@wolterskluwer.com

Other media articles relative to public safety broadband

http://www.publicsafetyreport.com/newsArticle.cfm?news_id=5817

http://ipaperus.ipaperus.com/HomelandSecurityToday/July2010/?Page=23
Here are links to the white paper and the NPSTC response.